Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Blog 2

On Sunday, November 2, 2014, The New York Times published an opinion based article titled "Cancel the Midterms"


The authors intended audience would be anyone who is eligible to votes and congressmen, because once congressmen are elected all the worry about is re-elections. Not giving enough attention to bigger problems in the nation.
 The author believes that midterm elections should be cancelled. He says they don’t let politicians / members of congress do their job correctly. If the member always has to worry about being re-elected, he’s never really focusing entirely on his job to represent all the people he has to.
 The author proposes to extend the term of a house member from 2 to 4 years and the term of a senator to either 4 or 8 years. Therefore the members would be elected during the presidential elections. The author states that by doing this “members of Congress [will have] the ability to focus more time and energy on governance instead of electioneering.”
Personally I agree with the author. The representatives shouldn't have to worry so much about being re-elected all the time. It would be perfect to elect representatives every time the presidential elections are going on. People would be more willing to vote for people of congress and house since it’s convenient.
Sometimes two years isn't enough to accomplish a lot.  For example immigration that would take a long time to figure out. If the members change every two years, then maybe the new members won’t agree with the seeing of the old members and they will never agree on anything. Two years isn't enough to accomplish almost everything.



No comments:

Post a Comment